|
|
English
|
English Articles
|
|
Written by Robert FAURISSON
|
Applied to the History of the Third World War May 11, 2003 The American government considers itself in a state of worldwide war against what it calls international terrorism. The Americans went to war with Iraq because, according to them, Saddam Hussein possessed weapons of mass destruction that threatened the United States. In support of that charge, they have not, up to now, provided any real evidence but instead only fallacious displays.
Some observers think this absence of real evidence must be embarrassing both for the White House and for those who, in the international community, have chimed in with George W. Bush and Tony Blair to assure us that Saddam Hussein had such weapons. Those observers are mistaken. They are unaware of the history of war propaganda; on this subject they ought to consult the revisionist authors. Then they would learn that, for the public at large, the best proof of the existence of those weapons is precisely the fact that no trace or evidence of them is to be found. |
|
Read more...
|
|
|
English Articles
|
|
Written by Miguel Martinez
|
Pacifici and Alemanno – the Zionist and the Neo-Fascist decide who must be silenced in Italy.
Antonio Caracciolo is a scholar of philosophy of law who is a member of the Faculty of Political Sciences of Rome University in Italy. Politically, he is a liberal in the Italian sense of the word: a believer in the separation of Church and state, constitutional democracy, the rule of law and a free market; however he keeps his opinions strictly out of his work, reserving them for his blog Civium Libertas.
Recently, his blog has dedicated much attention to the politics of Israel and the methods used by Zionist organizations in Italy to silence criticism of Israel in the Italian media and political sphere.
The Zionist discourse, in recent years, has focused increasingly on the extermination of the European Judaics during the Second World War, and this has led Antonio Caracciolo to touch another topic. As a liberal and legal scholar, he considers the attempt to introduce prison sentences against "Holocaust deniers" or "revisionists" incompatible with Articles 21 and 33 of the Italian constitution, which protect freedom of expression and of inquiry. In this context, however, Antonio Caracciolo has refused to get involved in historical discussions, or to support any "revisionist" thesis. |
|
Last Updated ( Sunday, 22 November 2009 )
|
|
Read more...
|
|
|
English Articles
|
|
Written by Dr. Abdullah Mohammad Sindi (Ph.D. International Relations)
|
http://radioislam.org/sindi/typic.htm#sindi
- Introduction
- Zionist Lies
- How and Why the “Holocaust” Lies Started
- Scholars and Historians Deny the “Holocaust”
- Conclusion
1. IntroductionThe word "holocaust" means an extensive destruction of humans by other humans resulting in the massive loss of life, especially by fire. However, the so-called "holocaust" by Nazi Germany against Jews is actually based on two major lies.
The first lie says that the Nazis killed "6 million" Jews. Because this figure is extremely exaggerated, it is a lie (see below for some reasonable and unbiased estimates).
The second lie says that these "6 million" Jews were rounded up and then "gassed" or "burned" alive. Again, this is a lie because there is no proof whatsoever that any live Jew was ever "gassed" or "burned" in any "gas chambers" or "crematories" in Nazi Germany.
Only those people who had died of dangerous infectious diseases such as typhoid (whether Jews or non-Jews) were burned or cremated in Nazi Germany in order to avoid epidemics. The number of these infected burned dead is much smaller than the “6,000,000” legend. It was a common and legal practice by Nazi Germany and other countries to burn or cremate dead people infected with fatal communicable diseases to avoid infecting the living. No one has ever declared this kind of practice to be illegal.
On the other hand, those Jews who were killed by Nazi conventional means (i.e., not gassed, and not burned) were no more special than the other overwhelming majority of non-Jewish victims who were also similarly killed by the same Nazi conventional means. Since the killing of non-Jews at the hands of the Nazis is not considered by anyone to be a "holocaust", why then should the killing of Jews by Nazi conventional means constitute a "holocaust”? |
|
Last Updated ( Sunday, 25 October 2009 )
|
|
Read more...
|
|
|
English Articles
|
|
Written by Administrator
|
|
On December 29, 1978, a short item headed "'The Problem of the Gas Chambers' or 'The Rumor of Auschwitz'," appeared in the pages of France's most influential daily paper, Le Monde. With the publication of this piece, written by a professor of literature at the University of Lyon II, the "Faurisson affair" burst into public awareness. In the same issue of the paper were also several anti-revisionist articles, including one entitled "Abundance of Proofs" by the Jewish scholar Georges Wellers. |
|
Last Updated ( Sunday, 04 October 2009 )
|
|
Read more...
|
|
|
English Articles
|
|
Written by Professor Thomas Dalton
|
|
Eisenhower’s book, Crusade in Europe (1948), is a single volume of some 550 pages—the smallest of the three. Reviewing the index, one finds no listing for ‘Auschwitz’, ‘Holocaust’, or ‘gas chambers’. The single entry for ‘Jews’ refers to the following paragraph: |
|
Read more...
|
|
|
English Articles
|
|
Written by Robert Faurisson
|
For the historian, the sociologist, or the jurist, the case of Australian revisionist Fredrick Toben is one of the simplest and most instructive. It is also both appalling and amusing.
One day, moved by curiosity, this German-born Australian left the antipodes on a journey to Europe in order to confer with an individual who had coined the phrase « No holes, no "Holocaust" ». From there he went on to Poland, to Auschwitz, where with his own eyes he observed that, in the effective absence of any "holes" in the collapsed roof of an alleged homicidal gas chamber, there was cause to doubt whether such chemical slaughterhouses had ever existed at that spot, the veritable centre of the "Holocaust". Finally, on a pilgrimage to the Germanic lands, he shared his doubts and asked for explanations, an act which earned him forthwith a stay in prison.
Voltaire would have liked this "affaire Calas" (of a less tragic sort). From it he could have drawn inspiration for a tale entitled: The Emperor's New Clothes or The Imposture. It seems right to imagine that, as in a classical French play, the story should evolve in five stages. |
|
Read more...
|
|
| << Start < Prev 1 2 3 4 5 Next > End >>
| | Results 1 - 6 of 30 |
|
English 
